Rugby Chat

Leeds Tykes 1 Sale FC 5.
Camborne 5 London Scottish 0.
Bury St Edmunds 4 Bishops Stortford 1.
Plymouth Albion 5 Cambridge 0.
Rosslyn Park 5 Sheffield 1.
Tonbridge Juddians 5 Dings Crusaders 0
Birmingham Moseley 4 Rams 0

Sale FC 5-1 Tonbridge Juddians
Bishops Stortford 5-1 Birmingham Moseley
Cambridge 5-1 Leeds Tykes
Dings Crusaders 5-1 Bury St Edmunds
London Scottish 0-5 Plymouth Albion
Rams 1-5 Rosslyn Park
Sheffield 0-5 Camborne

FT TJ 53 Cambridge 52

Leeds Tykes v London Scottish 1- 5
Birmingham Moseley v Dings Crusaders 2-2
Bury St Edmunds v Sale FC 2-5
Plymouth Albion v Sheffield 5-0
Rams v Bishops Stortford 1-5
Rosslyn Park v Camborne 1-4
Tonbridge Juddians v Cambridge 5-2

Confusing? I can't see any benefit other than another irrational move from World Rugby when there are more serious issues to address

* Fewer subs - front row (to be used for front row injury only) + 3, - return to field for injury only.
* Subs only warm up at their end during the match
* Scrum ...

Bishops Stortford v Rosslyn Park 1-5
Camborne v Plymouth Albion 1-5
Cambridge v Bury St Edmunds 5-2
Dings Crusaders v Rams 2-5
London Scottish v Tonbridge Juddians 5-0
Sale FC v Birmingham Moseley 5-0
Sheffield v Leeds Tykes 2-5

Birmingham Moseley 2-5 Cambridge
Bishops Stortford 5-1 Dings Crusaders
Bury St Edmunds 5-2 London Scottish
Leeds Tykes 0-5 Camborne
Rams 3-3 Sale FC
Rosslyn Park 5-1 Plymouth Albion
Tonbridge Juddians 4-0 Sheffield

FHLH here, I say boy, here we are again. Let's see how Cambridge get on in what looks like a very strong league.

I've heard it said that the standard of International matches for Women's rugby is Men's Championship at best.

I find Women's rugby far more exciting to watch although the tackling isn't what it should be. Is it because the backs get more possession or because England are one of the best teams?